Emissions (or carbon) trading is the buying and selling of the right to emit carbon dioxide. It is a growing market, which worries both the Financial Markets Law Committee and Friends of the Earth although they make their arguments from, naturally, very different positions.
The FMLC are concerned about legal uncertainties in the carbon emission allowances which underlie this market and have published a paper on this (October 2009). The FMLC point out that in the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme (EU-ETS), the largest carbon markets scheme, nothing provides any indication of the legal nature of emission allowances. Emission allowances, they say, have aspects of administrative grants or licences and of private property, and different conclusions as to their legal classification may already have been, or are in the course of being, reached in a number of Member States.
This matters because the legal nature of an emission allowance is relevant to decide which law govers the creation, transfer and cancellation of the allowance. Are they capable of being stolen? How do you treat them for tax and accounting purposes? If the holder becomes insolvent, how should the allowance be dealt with? If, as is happening, derivative interests in emissions are traded (allowances being recognised as a valuable financial commodity) should they be subject to regulation as an investment?
The FMLC believes that unless these issues are sorted out, they could slow down development of the market in carbon emission allowances.
Friends of the Earth, natuarally, have a different point of view in their report, “A dangerous obsession“. They don’t want banks to risk a collapse in confidence in the market by trading in derivatives of carbon credits. Taking a step back, in fact, they question whether carbon trading can reduce emissions levels effectively. They want governments to use more direct tools, e.g, they say, investment and regulation. The conclusion of their report demands the expansion of emission trading schemes to be halted globally, that the schemes be not linked, that offsets be removed from existing schemes and that schemes be reformed to avoid “abuse and profiteering by industry and finance”. They draw a parallel with the uncertainty surrounding the trading of derivatives in emissions against the collapse of the sub-prime mortgage market.
The FSA has responsibility for regulation of the emissions derivatives markets. It published a paper, “The emissions trading market: risks and challenges“ in March 2008. The paper sets out some technical considerations for risk managment of the emissions market. Personally, I think it is time they had another look at the topic, given this paper pre-dates the financial crisis.
The United Nations Climate Change conference is being held next month in Copenhagen. Iit is likely this issue will get more of an airing in the next few weeks.