<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Rome I &#8211; Should the UK Opt in?&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://banklawblog.wordpress.com/2008/04/15/rome-i-should-the-uk-opt-in/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://banklawblog.wordpress.com/2008/04/15/rome-i-should-the-uk-opt-in/</link>
	<description>An idiosyncratic selection of news in the world of English bank law.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 11:12:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rome 1 conference &#171; Bank Law Blog</title>
		<link>http://banklawblog.wordpress.com/2008/04/15/rome-i-should-the-uk-opt-in/#comment-1382</link>
		<dc:creator>Rome 1 conference &#171; Bank Law Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 07:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://banklawblog.wordpress.com/?p=193#comment-1382</guid>
		<description>[...] Earlier posts on this blog, when there was still some doubt as to whether the UK should join, are here.  The conference will cover the position generally, and in the fields of financial services, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Earlier posts on this blog, when there was still some doubt as to whether the UK should join, are here.  The conference will cover the position generally, and in the fields of financial services, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
